I don't understand the wisdom of suspending Mr. Kearbey with pay until all law enforcement reports are in and his case is adjudicated.
City policy clearly states employees can be suspended without pay pending legal outcomes. How the city can justify this expense with the severe financial position they claim to be in is beyond me.
I served on the use tax committee earlier in the year, which failed by only 13 votes. Had it passed, city tax could have been added to all internet purchases. At that time, we told citizens if it didn't pass, city jobs would be lost and services would be cut. Currently, most city departments are operating with less staff and some services have been reduced.
Within the last month, a Missouri State Highway Patrol trooper was suspended without pay while his investigation is ongoing. What's the difference?
It seems to me if the city is broke you send Mr. Kearbey home without pay until the investigation is complete and the court proceedings are concluded. Should he be acquitted of these charges the city should pay his back wages and reinstate him as street superintendent. However, if he is found guilty, look at the money the would have saved by his suspension.
Don Schrieber
Publisher
Daily American
Republic